Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ruomoplus.lib.uom.gr/handle/8000/1508| Title: | The SILL revisited in light of the S2R model of language learning | Authors: | Papadopoulou, Iris Kantaridou, Zoe Platsidou, Maria Gavriilidou, Zoe |
Author Department Affiliations: | Foreign Language Teaching in the University of Macedonia Foreign Language Teaching in the University of Macedonia Department of Educational & Social Policy |
Author School Affiliations: | School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts | Subjects: | FRASCATI__Humanities__Languages and Literature FRASCATI__Social sciences__Educational sciences |
Keywords: | SILL language learning strategies self-regulation metastrategies motivation |
Issue Date: | 2018 | Publisher: | Taylor & Francis | Journal: | The Language Learning Journal | ISSN: | 0957-1736 | Volume: | 46 | Issue: | 5 | Start page: | 544 | End page: | 556 | Abstract: | The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) [Oxford, R.L. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle] has been a widely used instrument for self-assessing the frequency of language learning strategy use across cultures and levels of education for some 30 years. Despite the fact that its six-factor solution has not been confirmed, it has displayed acceptable reliability across cultures and translations. In the present study, we attempt to demonstrate a new factor solution for the Greek version of the SILL which is in line with the S2R model of language learning. Our sample consisted of 1308 primary and secondary school students from public schools in the regions of Northern Greece. The SILL v7.0 was used with four additional items selected and adapted from SILL v5.0. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed six factors which explained 42.48% of the total variance and demonstrated good or adequate reliability. The first two factors indicate the metastrategies of ‘monitoring cognition for progress’ and ‘obtaining resources’. The other four factors indicated strategies of ‘deep cognitive processing’, ‘using resources’, ‘surface cognitive processing’ and ‘overcoming gaps of knowledge’. We compare our results with factor solutions of the SILL obtained in earlier studies and we discuss implications for the development of new instruments to better accommodate the S2R model of language learning. |
URI: | https://ruomoplus.lib.uom.gr/handle/8000/1508 | DOI: | 10.1080/09571736.2018.1502739 | Corresponding Item Departments: | Foreign Language Teaching in the University of Macedonia Foreign Language Teaching in the University of Macedonia Department of Educational & Social Policy |
| Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILL revisited-corrected07062018.pdf | 687,23 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Page view(s)
187
checked on Apr 18, 2026
Download(s)
100
checked on Apr 18, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.