Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ruomoplus.lib.uom.gr/handle/8000/491
Title: | Designing Social Robots as Embodied Mediators in Education : the Potential of Participatory Design | Authors: | Fachantidis, Nikolaos Christodoulou, Panagiota Pliasa, Sofia Velentza, Anna-Maria Georgakopoulou, Nefeli Notios, Nektarios Papadopoulos, Konstantinos Sfakianakis, Stavros Pnevmatikos, Dimitris |
Author Department Affiliations: | Department of Educational & Social Policy Laboratory of Informatics and Robotics in Education and Society (LIRES) Department of Educational & Social Policy |
Author School Affiliations: | School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts |
Subjects: | FRASCATI__Engineering and technology FRASCATI__Social sciences__Educational sciences |
Keywords: | Socially assistive robots Social robot design |
Issue Date: | May-2022 | Publisher: | IEEE | Volume: | IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) | Abstract: | In the last decades, robotic research and development started to aim beyond industrial applications and focus on designing social robots. In this transitional era of Robotics, some aspects of their design seem to need reconsideration, particularly the embodiment dimension. The participatory design approach has been implemented successfully in designing products and processes related to humans, with a user-centered methodology, including the stakeholders in the early design stages. This work presents two cases of participatory design implementation in social assistive robots development. In the case of the STIMEY robot, a human-like toy-sized robot for students, an extensive participatory design process took place with qualitative focus group discussion (127 stakeholders). A deductive qualitative content analysis approach led to five combinations of dimensions used to design a SAR, which could be considered general design guidelines. In the case of the DAISY robot, a flower-like robot for students with autism, the participatory design was intended to define part of the features and characteristics of the robot. The researchers decided on the rest of the design issues based on the relative educational theories. This combinational approach made it possible to quickly and thoroughly address all design issues and come up with a unique and defined final choice.In both cases, the evaluation of the prototype robots through a task-oriented robot-assisted learning sequence indicated that participants endorsed the final design of the robots for physical interventions. The different implementations of participatory design in the above two cases could show the adaptability and the potential of the participatory method in the design process of social robots' appearance, physical presence and embodiment. |
URI: | https://ruomoplus.lib.uom.gr/handle/8000/491 | Rights: | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | Corresponding Item Departments: | Department of Educational & Social Policy Laboratory of Informatics and Robotics in Education and Society (LIRES) Department of Educational & Social Policy |
Appears in Collections: | Conference proceedings |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Designing Social Robots_IEEE_Fachantidis_ERREM_ICRA2022.pdf | 602,59 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
67
checked on Apr 21, 2025
Download(s)
41
checked on Apr 21, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License